A weblog for Pete Ellertsen's mass communications students at Benedictine University Springfield.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

COMM 150: In-class discussion, entertainment media

On page 245 of "The Media of Mass Communication," John Vivian asks, "What are the advantages of live performances over mediated performances?" Good question, but it raises several other questions. Let's unpack some of them. In small groups, please discuss how the following questions apply to music, storytelling, sports, video games and any other forms of entertainment that Vivian doesn't mention:
  • For starters, what is a "mediated performance?" How does Vivian define the term? How do you define it? How is it different from live performance?
  • What are the advantages of live performances over mediated performances? (This is Vivian's original question.)
  • What are the advantages of mediated over live performances?
  • What are some of the trade-offs between the two?
  • How do we experience each? As performers? As audience members?
  • What benefits do you receive as a performer from a live audience, from a performance carried by the media?
  • What benefits do you receive as an audience member from a live performance, from a mediated performance?
  • How are technologies and media platforms like Skype and YouTube changing the boundaries between live and mediated performance?
Break into small groups. (You don't have to count off. Just get with the people sitting at your row, or the people sitting nearest you.) Discuss, and be ready to report to the rest of the class what you learned from talking it over with your classmates.

4 comments:

Pete said...

Choose one of the questions, discuss and report. Post some of your main points to the comments field – be sure to put everybody’s name in your group on it so you all get credit for the class discussion.

- Doc

chris day said...

Chris Day
Nick Jachino
Dave Maziarz

What are the advantages of live performances over mediated performances?

At a live even you get to experience the atmosphere. We consider a live even to be more intense. You can interact with other audience members, as well as the live interaction with the preformer. As athletes it is more advertised when our sporting event is going to be covered. It seems as if it is more than just another game, the intensity is greater because we know the fact that there will be more people either at, listening, or watching the game.

Haley said...

-With Rachael

When watching a live performence you get a better expierence as far as atmosphere and seeing the performer's true talent and personality. You get mor of the the raw aspect. Howvever it is more expensive to see a live performance and it is more convienent to watch a mediated one.

MHovey said...

Morgan Hovey
Mary Senger
Anthony Kohlus

Live Performance
more real/raw
chance to mess up
audience interaction
energized atmosphere
group dynamics
performer interaction
can be 3D

Mediated Performance
edited
added effects
cheaper
reaches wider audience
alone
rewind and rewatch
lose interaction with audience

Blog Archive

About Me

Springfield (Ill.), United States
I'm a retired English, journalism and cultural studies teacher at Springfield College in Illinois (acquired by Benedictine University and subsequently closed). I coordinate jam sessions for the "Clayville Pioneer Academy of Music" at Clayville Historic Site and the Prairieland Strings dulcimer club, and I sing in the choir and the contemporary praise team at Peace Lutheran Church in Springfield. On Hogfiddle I post links and video clips for our sessions and workshops on the mountain dulcimer (a.k.a. "hog fiddle"), as well as research notes on folklore and cultural studies, hymnody and traditional Anglo-Celtic and Scandinavian music. I also posted assignments and readings in my interdisciplinary humanities classes. The Mackerel Wrapper (now on hiatus), carried assignments and readings for my mass comm. students. I started teaching b/log when I chaired SCI-Benedictine's assessment committee, and reopened it as the privatization of public schools grew increasingly troubling and closer to home.