A weblog for Pete Ellertsen's mass communications students at Benedictine University Springfield.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

The essence of every beauty ad [or shaving, or beer ...] you'll ever see on TV

Since I won't be teaching next semester, this may be the last post to The Mackerel Wrapper for a while. So, for my communications students -- and anybody else who surfs into the blog -- I'm linking to a sketch on advertising from the TV show That Mitchell and Webb Look on BBC television. It will keep longer than the previous items about a spring semester final paper that was due two weeks ago now.

Credit where it's due: I got it from comedian Rollie Williams, who posted it under the headline "Every Beauty Ad Ever In 58 Seconds" to Upworthy at http://www.upworthy.com/, a social media site that's heavily critical of the fluff in media, especially the Internet, and defines its mission like this: "Hi, we're Upworthy, a new social media outfit with a mission: to help people find important content that is as fun to share as a FAIL video of some idiot surfing off his roof." .

Monday, April 30, 2012

COMM 353: Schedule of classes, coming into the home stretch ... ** UPDATE 1x - IS THIS WHAT THE FUTURE WILL LOOK LIKE?

We have two regular class periods left, and the final exam period. Please note the following change: I am scheduling a brief session during the regularly scheduled time for our final exam, from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. Thursday, May 10. I need the time to prepare a synopsis of the outside jurors' evaluations of Bulldog Bytes. The revised schedule is as follows:
  • Tuesday, May 1. We will wrap up our discussion of James Thurbers' "Years With Ross" and The New Yorker. I noticed a couple of you mentioned Rolling Stone as a magazine today that compares to the New Yorker in its day. Let's look at their website at http://www.rollingstone.com/ and compare notes. Is Rolling Stone outmoded already? What are publications of the future going to look like?
  • Thursday, May 3. We will roll out Bulldog Bytes to a small, but select group (it may be a group of one, but I'll be there if no one else is). Your self-reflective essays are due: Please submit them to me electronically.
  • Thursday, May 10. I will return your graded self-reflective essays and give you a synopsis of the outside jurors' comments on Bulldog Bytes. After which we will ride off into the sunset.
UPDATE: They're not exactly literary, but the "hyperlocal" publications they talk about in the news biz may be one potential business model. They're almost wholly on line, they rely on amateur (and usually unpaid) bloggers, and they're springing up in "underserved" areas in the more populated parts of the country. I got to thinking about them when I was exchanging emails with David Logan, chair of our Arts & Letters division at Benedictine-Springfield:
When I say newspapers are as dead as the passenger pigeon and the great auk, I'm thinking more about the ink-on-paper platform. Have you seen the Patch.com websites up in the Chicago suburbs? They have a business model like you descirbe, a few professionals who coordinate the output of community bloggers, etc., in "underserved communities." That means little towns without a paper, inner-city neighborhoods or the suburbs around Chicago that don't get covered by the Trib or the Sun-Times. I first ran across it when I was following the Occupy profests in California, and I think the basic concept behind it could be adapted to a small campus like ours. Go to http://www.patch.com/ and click on "About Us."

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Picasso's 'Guernica,' COMM 353, the nature of art and the anniversary of a bombing that changed the way we see the world

Copy of Picasso's 'Guernica' in Guernica (Creative Commons)

In class today, Robyn mentioned Picasso's painting "Guernica," his response to the terror bombing of a Basque city during the Spanish Civil War. Turned out today was the anniversary of the bombing, on April 26, 1937, the town of Guernica destroyed by German aircraft supporting the fascist revolution that brought Spanish Gen. Francisco Franco tp [pwer/ Today the German newspaper Der Spiegel had a writeup on the bombing and its aftermath that fills in the story behind the painting. Reported Annika Müller of Der Spiegel:

The Basque town of Guernica was bustling with activity on April 26, 1937. "It was market day, and there were finally some sweets on sale once again," says Luis Iriondo Aurtenetxea, who was 14 years old at the time. There was a cloudless sky, the 89-year-old adds, and glorious spring weather.

The diary of a German pilot who took off in his "Heinkel" bomber in Burgos at around 3 p.m. that day confirms Iriondo's recollections. "We couldn't have asked for better weather for the operation," the pilot wrote. Over the next few hours, he and 37 other pilots belonging to the "Condor Legion" would shower Guernica with thousands of bombs. They were supported by a squadron of fighter planes that flew so low "that one could make out the pilots' faces," according to reports from survivors.

* * *

In the evening, when the bombers were finally gone and Iriondo could leave his shelter, the town that had been the spiritual and cultural center of the Basques was engulfed in flames. As the British historian Gijs van Hensbergen has written, by 7:45 p.m., Guernica had practically ceased to exist.

Hardly any of the houses, which were built primarily with bricks and wooden framing, remained intact. The town hall, the church and the hospital had been completely destroyed. That evening, the only thing remaining in its previous place was the sacred oak tree. What's more, not a single bomb had landed on the Astra weapons factory or the bridge in the suburb of Renteria, which was supposedly the primary objective of the attack.

Despite initial claims to the contrary, the Germans were not primarily concerned with clearing a path for Franco's troops. When testifying during the Nuremberg Trials, Hermann Göring, the leading Nazi figure and aviation minister since 1933, said that this effort to support General Franco was much more about having an ideal opportunity to test out his still young air force and examine in a live-fire situation "whether the material had been adequately developed."

Thus, Guernica was a dress rehearsal of sorts for the blitzkrieg and a new breed of warfare that held no regard for civilian populations. ...

Estimates of the death toll range from 200 to 3,000, in a town of 7,000. It was the first time heavy bombing had been unleashed on a civilian population, and Picasso, who was Spanish, was horrified. He was already commissioned to do a mural for the Spanish exhibit at an international fair in Paris, and he did the painting we know as "Guernica" instead. According to Wikipedia, which has an unusually good article on the painting, "Guernica shows the tragedies of war and the suffering it inflicts upon individuals, particularly innocent civilians. This work has gained a monumental status, becoming a perpetual reminder of the tragedies of war, an anti-war symbol, and an embodiment of peace."

In class today, we were talking about art. By anybody's definition, the "Guernica" is a work of art.

After Franco's death, it was returned to Spain. When I saw it, the painting was still in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. It was powerful, and a reminder that sometimes the best art is political in a way that transcends the issues of the day. The picture above is of a tiled wall in Guernica that reproduces the Picasso painting. It is available in Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

COMM 353: Interview with a copy editor at the New Yorker ... and some thoughts (*soliciting your thoughts, too) on craftsmanship

__________

* Did you notice the in-class writing assignment cleverly embedded in the headline? Details are at the bottom of the post, in boldface type.

There's an interesting interview with a New Yorker copyeditor on literary agent Andy Ross' blog. Dated Sept. 20, 2009, it features Mary Norris, whom we know as the author of a piece on punctuation I posted to our blog a couple of weeks ago, and it's full of little random glimpses of the sense of craftsmanship The New Yorker is famous for.

The one I liked best was a little throw-away remark at the end of a long reminiscence about working under the New Yorker's editors from the 1980s to the present. It came at the very end, after a fascinating tangent on "hot type" (i.e. type that was cast in hot metal instead of the photoengraving processes used now). So you should read the whole thing to get to it:

Andy: You have worked under [editors] William Shawn, Robert Gottlieb, Tina Brown, and David Remnick. Do you have a sense that there was a "golden age" of TNY or are we living in it now?

Mary: Hmmm. Sometimes when I have occasion to look back at an issue from the Shawn days, I am moved by the beauty of those vintage magazines: the lines of type were fitted character by character, the hot type is very alive, the black-and-white columns of print have a classic purity. Bob Gottlieb was careful to maintain that, though he introduced some changes. Tina Brown brought in color and photography, and shortened the length of pieces (and probably the attention span of the general reader). I think that what David Remnick has done is bring his newsman’s nose to the job. Remnick has succeeded in making The New Yorker a vital part of the national conversation. We seem to have found our voice after 9/11.

On the other hand, you find fewer quirky pieces that may not be particularly newsworthy but that readers love. For instance, “Uncle Tungsten,” by Oliver Sacks. (I still regret making him spell “sulfur” our way, with the “f,” when he wanted to spell it the old-fashioned British way, “sulphur,” which he’d grown up with.) Ian Frazier’s two-part piece on his travels in Siberia is a good recent example of a beautiful, funny, interesting, old-fashioned piece of writing. A good writer can make you care about anything.

There you have it: A good writer can make you care about anything. Even the nit-picky craft agenda of a copyeditor for The New Yorker.

That's my favorite. What's yours?

Craftsmanship is part and parcel of the New Yorker's brand, and Norris is all about craftsmanship. Merriam-Webster defines a craftsman as: "1 : a worker who practices a trade or handicraft; or 2 : one who creates or performs with skill or dexterity especially in the manual arts." What's your definition of craftsmanship? What's the difference between a craftsman and an artist? Do you consider yourself a craftsman? How important do you expect craftsmanship to be in your career as a writer, editor or communications professional?

Did you learn anything about craftsmanship in COMM 353? From working on Bulldog Bytes? From reading the how-to advice from Carol Saller and Nancy Brigham? From reading about Harold Ross and The New Yorker? How craftsmanslike was James Thurber? In your opinion, was he more of an artist or a craftsman? Did you pick up anything you can take away with you? (Or is that the same as the first question?) Can publications today be as careful as The New Yorker? Can you?

Please post your thoughts as comments below.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

COMM 353: Editing ... what worked? what didn't? How could we make it better?

In her handbook "How to Do Leaflets, Newsletters & Newspapers," Nancy Brigham suggest three ways of doing the editing piece for a publication (121-22). Quoted verbatim (but with citations omitted), they are:
  • One editor. One person has the job of editing everything for a particular issue. The job can rotate from month to month, or it can remain with the same person. If your group has paid staff, one staffer might become editor. The editor would still show articles to other people to get their advice. Clear controversial articles with other leaders or an expert.
  • An editor for each story. At the first planning meeting, assign each story an editor as well as a writer. This process might make articles less consistent, but it encourages a closer relationship between writer and editor. It gives everyone valuable experience without overloading one person.
  • An editing meeting. Some publications hold a staff meeting the date articles are due. Everyone shows up early to read the stories and write comments. Edit for overall content, approach, and what to cut or expand at such a meeting; but avoid getting into details, or your meeting will turn into marathons. And people might get so carried away with their own ideas, they forget the writer has rights and feelings. / Editing at meetings maies sense only when your group is very close, persnaly and politically. Even then, assign individual editors to finish going over each article and work personally with each writer.

As we put Bulldog Bytes together, we opted for a combination of the first and second methods. With the benefit of hindsight, let's review that decision.

Background. I thought we made the right decision, based partly on my own experience and my suspicion from reading between the lines that Brigham had tried the third - group editing - and swore she'd never do that again. But with hindsight, I think we would have caught any misspelled bylines if we'd had a group process. If I were doing it again, I might try for some combination of all three of Brigham's methods. But that's what I think. I want to hear what you think.

So here's the question. How well did our editing process work? What worked? What didn't? What would you recommend to the next group of students in COMM 353 as they begin their class project? Post your preliminary, top-of-the-head thoughts as comments. And let's discuss.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

COMM 353: If you haven't seen this already ...

ReelSEO.com, an online magazine that focuses on business video and, apparently, Search Engine Optimization (which must be where the SEO on their name comes from), has a link and story on a video ad for TNT (Turner Network Television) that's gone viral. To see why, click on the video:



Explains Chris Atkinson of ReelSEO:
A few days ago, cable’s TNT unleashed a “We Know Drama” ad that, ironically, is really funny. You may have seen it by now, but it’s well worth an in-depth look as an example of branded entertainment. In the world of online video, it’s not enough to simply display a bunch of dramatic TV shows and movies that your brand specializes in, you have to grab the viewer’s attention with something special, perhaps original, and definitely something that people will talk about later. TNT’s ad takes the “Improv Anywhere” model and runs with it very successfully. ...
There's more. I think that reference should be to a group called Improve Everywhere, based in New York City. Anyway, it's a combination of improv and flash mobbing. And it does add drama.

COMM 353: Self-reflective essay - assignment sheet ** UPDATED 1x **

D R A F T

This is a rough draft, and I expect to do some tinkering to: (1) correct any illiteracies and references to other courses from which I copied and pasted parts of this assignment sheet; and (2) focus more specifically on some of the themes in Saller, Thurber and Nancy Brigham (the handouts from the UAW editorial consultant), especially editing as a collaborative process and management function.

Update on updates: Since I will be updating it, you should check back from time to time until I post a notice that it's in final form. Updates will be noted in the headline - UPDATED 1x - 2x - 3x - however many times it's been updated. - pe


Self-reflective essay (100 points). Write an essay of at least 1,250 words (five typed pages) in response to the questions below. Please feel free (or compelled) to quote freely, and attribute your quotes. Write as if you were submitting your essay for publication. Strive for a conversational tone. The essay is due Thursday, May 3. Email it to me and/or give it to me in person - but let's make sure I get it.

How has your perception of yourself as a writer, editor and/or media professional changed as a result of what we have studied in COMM 353? What was your overall sense of your professional development before you took the course? How has that changed as a result of your reading, class discussion, collaborating on the class project and observing the process by which it came together? How much have you used what you learned in COMM 353 in your other writing? What did you learn that surprised you the most? How, specifically, did it surprise you? Has your attitude toward writing and editing changed as a result of the course?

What worked? What didn’t work? Which of the texts and handouts we read for class helped you as a writer, i.e. suggested techniques you might try in your own writing or attitudes you might incorporate into your own craft agenda? Which suggested things you want to avoid at all costs! What did you learn from reading about the theory of editing and applying it to the practice of writing and producing our demonstation project? What was beneficial? What wasn’t?

INSERT A -- xxx some specifc stuff here on editing as a collaborative process and management function, what you knew about it ain Januray, what has changed -- how it can fit into your career as a wtiter, editor or media professional

Here are some questions, adapted from an English course at the University of Colorado-Denver, to help you think about your development as a writer:
  • How has your writing changed during this semester?
  • What do you see as your greatest strengths as a writer?
  • What areas of your writing are you still working on?
  • What do you think of as “good writing?” How do you evaluate your own writing and that of others?

In grading this essay, as always, I will evaluate the relevance of your discussion to the main goals and objectives of the course; the detail you cite to support or illustrate your points; and the connections you make. Be specific.

Here are some tips on self-reflective essays, from my old faculty webpage and other sources. Since COMM 353 is a writing and editing course (which academics classify as a "skills" course), this squib from an old handout on reflective essays linked to my faculty page may be helpful:
Writing (skills) courses. A skills course is one where you learn, or practice, a skill like writing. If you're taking freshman English or journalism, you'll be thinking -- reflecting -- about how you've grown as a writer. What was your writing like when you began the course? Is it better now? Are you more confident? Do you know where to look stuff up? Are you mastering the inverted pyramid format? (Basic newswriting is both a skills course and a content course, by the way, so if you're taking COM 209 look at my tips for content courses as well.) Consult the goals and objectives in our syllabus, or the "competencies" in the Illinois Articulation Iniative guidelines for the course. They'll suggest what you're supposed to learn. Be specific. What specific strategies, techniques or skills have you learned? It never hurts to be specific.
And here is a link to a very good discussion of self-reflective writing from Fairhaven College, Western Washington University. I especially like this:
A VITAL POINT: Try to write in a way which communicates information about the content of a course or independent study. Do not just speak in abstractions and personal feelings, such as "This class was extremely important to me because through discussion and the readings my thinking developed immensely." What subject? Which discussions? What did you read? think about what? developed from where to where?? A reader who does not know what the class studied should be able to gain an idea from your self-evaluation. One should be able to form some judgment about how well you understand a subject from what you say about it, not merely that you claim to understand it. In other words, BE SPECIFIC, BE SPECIFIC, BE SPECIFIC, BE SPECIFIC, BE SPECIFIC, and, finally, BE CONCRETE.
And this, which will help you evaluate all your courses, not just COMM 353 ...
To quote former Fairhaven dean Phil Ager, "It is a fiction to measure learning in a single way which therefore can be recorded by a single letter grade." Instead, he argues, there are at least four different kinds of learning:

Cognitive. Your new understandings and knowledge? What is the most important single piece of knowledge gained? What will you remember in a year? five years? How has your knowledge grown? changed? become more sound?

Skills. New skills gained? old skills improved? your ability to solve problems, think, reason, research? Did you actually use these skills? What skills do you need to develop next?

Judgment. Do you understand the difference between process and content? Can you apply principles? to other classes? life? If you took the class again, what would you do differently? Has your way of thinking changed?

Affective. (emotions and feelings) Did you change? your beliefs? values? Was the class worth your time? Do you feel good about it? the single most important thing you learned about you? Evaluate your participation in discussion. Did you discuss and learn with other students? How has the course altered your behavior? Did you grow? shrink? stagnate? float?

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

COMM 353: Agenda for today's edit board meeting in class ... ** UPDATED w/ MONDAY'S CLASS NOTES **

A G E N D A

I have two items for the editorial board, with copies of email messages attached to further explain the agenda items:


  1. Distribution of Bulldog Bytes - how are we going to get the PDF file to faculty? Please see Attachment 1 below for details.

  2. Planning public presentation (sorry about all those P's!) May 3. We need to decide: (a) how to present the meagazine; and (b) how to publicize it.
Please note: If you feel like other students, e.g. managing and layout editors, have put in more effort so far than you have, this is your chance to even the balance!

Attachment 1: Project update - COMM 353

The following message was sent to the five Benedictine Univesity Springfield faculty and administration members who have agreed to be jurors, via email Saturday, April 14, 2012 7:01 PM. Copies were emailed to you, but here it is again for convenient reference:

To: Outside readers, Bulldog Bytes

Thanks so much for agreeing to evaluate Bulldog Bytes, the student project in Communications 353 (advanced seminar - magazine editing). The magazine is finished now, and a PDF file has been saved to the faculty computer in Dawson 220. Plans now are to get it to you Tuesday. If the file can be compressed sufficiently, it will be emailed to you; if it can't be emailed, the students will copy it to flashdrives and deliver it to you in your offices. In either event, I will email you to let you know how we're handling it.

Since we're getting the completed project to you a few days later than we had anticipated, I am moving back the deadline in order to give you more time to work it into your schedules. (When we planned the production schedule, we made sure to build in enough time for contingencies like this.) The deadline is now a week later, on Tuesday, May 1.

We also tentatively plan to present the magazine to the university community during our class period, at 2:30 p.m. Thursday, May 3. We'll send out invitations as our plans develop; in the meantime, we hope you'll be able keep your schedules open so you can drop by Dawson 220 at that time.

Student layout editor Stacie Taylor has asked me to let you know that the document should be viewed by clicking on "book" and "two-sided" options in the pulldown menus in the PDF-viewing software; please change the setting under the "new" drop-down menu. She advises that the layout is best viewed at 50%, and content is best viewed at 100%.

To this message I am attaching an evaluation questionnaire. As I said in my earlier email, I'm asking jurors to consider things like whether the design and layout are attractive; the content is interesting and targeted to its intended audience of readers in the BenU-Springfield community; the articles are well written and observe the conventions of correct usage; the pictures and graphics enhance the story; and an overall judgment call of whether the product looks professional. I'm not asking you to grade the magazine (although you should feel free to recommend a grade if you wish), and I'm focusing on the product rather than the process.

If you have any questions, comments and/or suggestions, please don't hesitate to get back to me.

- Pete Ellertsen, instructor
Attachment 2: RE presentation in comm 353?

Messages in the following thread were exchanged during the weekend:

Monday, April 16, 2012 5:31 PM
From: "David Logan" [ADDRESS REDACTED]
To: "'peter ellertsen'" [ADDRESS REDACTED]
Looks good to me. Any opportunity for them to get up and present is a good one.

I'll try my best to attend.

David Logan
Chair & Associate Professor, Division of Arts and Letters
Prose Editor, Quiddity International Literary Journal
Benedictine University at Springfield


-----Original Message-----
From: peter ellertsen [ADDRESS REDACTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:32 PM
To: David Logan
Subject: presentation in comm 353?

David -

I'd like to have the students give a public presentation of the class
project for COMM 353 - mostly so they'll get some added experience for the
kind of presentations they'll do as graduate students (most of these kids
are going on to grad school whether they know it yet or not) and/or
professionals in the communications industry - and I plan to have Jason send
out blast emails to students, faculty and staff on the Springfield campus.
But I thought I'd better run it by you first and get your blessing, along
with comments and suggestions (!), before getting too far along with the
planning. We would do it during our last class period, at 2:30 p.m.,
Thursday, May 3, and I imagine it would last 20 minutes to a half hour.

So here's a preliminary draft, abelow the 3-em dash, subject to changes I'll
solicit from the students in class Tuesday. Please let me know what you
think.

Thx a million!

- Pete

---

Students, faculty and members of the administration at Benedictine
University at Springfield are invited to the presentation of "Bulldog
Bytes," a magazine on physical fitness opportunities for BenU-Springfield
students. The magazine was planned, written, edited and produced by students
in Communications 353 (advanced seminar - magazine editing). The
presentation will be at 2:30 p.m. Thursday, May 3, in the computer lab at
Dawson 220. The magazine xxx [I think the students should supply this
description].

Students in COMM 353 are Nick Jachino, John McCarthy, Robyn Nadziejko,
Stacie Taylor and Van Wirth. Instructor is Pete Ellertsen.





GOALS OF PRESENTATION

john -
1. explain why BB sted lit j
2. format – nitche journal – but widely accessible

stacie = editing [process cf. what we read. sked. deadlines. troubles.
simple process – what we learned – collective


mass email –
invididual – announce in other classes –

ideas for blast email --

STUDENTS will give a presentation of the process and reflect on how the final product came together. The magazine -- sports we’ve got, what’s going on in town – local events – exercise – new stuff on and around campus.
We look forward to seeing you. For more information, please contact – oh, for more information, just come to the presentation!
athletics on- and off-campus –
mini-workouts for the athletic mind.

COMM 353: Deadlines and due dates, expiration of grace period for Thurber paper

While we were putting Bulldog Bytes to bed, I've been quietly extending the deadline for your papers on James Thurber's "Years With Ross." I figured, as I said in class a couple of times, your time was better spent working on the magazine. Today, however, we're finished with the magazine. So that reasoning no longer holds, and the paper is now due at the beginning of class Thursday, May 19. Here are the new dates for the paper:
  • Papers that have been turned in to me by the beginning of class today will receive 10 extra points on top of the grade I assign for the paper.
  • Papers that are turned in by the beginning of class Thursday will receive the grade I assign them, with no points added or deducted.
  • Papers that are turned in by class on Tuesday, April 24, will have 10 points deducted from their grade.
  • Papers turned in by class Thursday, April 26, will have 20 points deducted.
  • Papers turned in by class Tuesday, May 1, will have 40 points deducted.
  • Papers turned in by class Thursday, May 3, will have 50 points deducted.
You should be aware that my patience with late papers is now exhausted. You can turn in the papers by emailing them to me and/or giving me the hard copy in class. Preferably both.

Due dates for final self-reflective essay. I hope to have an assignment sheet (or essay prompt) posted to the Mackerel Wrapper by class on Thursday, April 19, and the paper itself will be due on Thursday, May 1, the last day of class. As I said in class last week, the essay will be like a five- to eight-page version of "Question 2" on my final exams (which have been posted to the blog since 2006): What did you know about magazine editing before you took COMM 353? What did you learn? What do you know now? What surprised you? What did you get from the mix of theory and practice in the course? What can you take with you as you continue your careers as students, writers, editors and/or communications professionals?

Saturday, April 14, 2012

“‘Abe ... Never Could Sing Much’: Camp Meeting Songs and Fiddle Tunes in New Salem.”

Pete Ellertsen, volunteer editor in the oral history program at Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum, will give a talk entirled “‘Abe … Never Could Sing Much’: Camp Meeting Songs and Fiddle Tunes in New Salem” from 10 a.m. to noon Saturday, April 28, in the conference room at the Visitor Center, Lincoln’s New Salem State Historic Site, off Ill. 97 at Petersburg.

Pete will present a program based on his research into the music of New Salem, where he uses the Appalachian dulcimer to interpret the Southern upland culture of the period. During the 1830s, popular sheet music for piano and guitar was beginning to compete with the Anglo-Celtic ballads, fiddle tunes and folk hymns handed down by oral tradition. So we can document both kinds of music on the Illinois frontier.

Pete will emphasize music attested at New Salem and the nearby Rock Creek Cumberland Presbyterian Church, as well as songs that William Herndon was told were sung by Abraham Lincoln's family and fiddle tunes that John Armstrong, the son of old settlers, played for Edgar Lee Masters in 1914, a session of which Masters said "I felt that somehow I was in the
Rutledge Tavern at New Salem" and "I felt that he was re-creating the past of the deserted village for me."

Friday, April 13, 2012

COMM 353: A dash of seasoning from the New Yorker's "comma shaker," dedicated to my parents, Mother Theresa, and the pope

Posted yesterday, to the Culture Desk blog, an little tour de force In Defense of “Nutty” Commas by Mary Norris, who describes herself as the "keeper of the comma shaker here at The New Yorker."

Everyone knows that The New Yorker is famously fuddy-duddy for its use of “close” punctuation. The copy editor from whom I inherited the comma shaker was herself not a fan of our style on commas; hence her painstaking creation of this one-of-a-kind item—a cannister (we spell it with two “n”s) about the size of a giant can of grated cheese, wrapped in brown paper flecked with hand-drawn commas, and topped with a perforated blue lid. The joke, of course, is that we are overliberal in our use of commas and ought to be more judicious.


Nobody is really arguing about the serial comma. We like it because it prevents ambiguity." Then she goes into a convoluted example involving a "my boss, her nephew and my acupuncturist" (the pronouns are important here, but you'll have to read Norris' post to find out why." She concludes:
... the point is that when you restrict the use of the serial comma solely to those instances where a genuine ambiguity exists, then every time you come to a series you have to stop and think. By adopting the serial comma, we have more energy to devote to sprinkling in commas elsewhere.


Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/04/in-defense-of-commas.html#ixzz1ryDKtCQa

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/04/in-defense-of-commas.html#ixzz1ryDBlf4v

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/04/in-defense-of-commas.html#ixzz1ryCuiiGt

keeper of the comma shaker here at The New Yorker

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/04/in-defense-of-commas.html#ixzz1ryC6QW12

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2012/04/in-defense-of-commas.html#ixzz1ryC6QW12

Monday, April 09, 2012

Worth a thousand words?

Screen shot from the Google news page the morning of April 9, 2012. Note juxtaposition of picture, headline and story:

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

COMM 353: Cat eats homework ...



News item (well, I guess you can call it news) in Huffington Post: "Student Posts Video Of Cat Literally Eating Their Homework (VIDEO)." Click here for the background. Here's the nut graf:
Reddit user kittymonzo posted a YouTube video of her cat viciously mauling what is identified as the owner's homework assignment on the kitchen counter. Okay, so maybe not viciously, but the feline is certainly going to town on that piece of paper.
By the way, if you haven't turned in your midterm yet and you're still taking the course (you know who you are), you can still get full credit if you produce a sworn affidavit from your cat testifying that said cat did in fact eat your midterm. If you don't have such an affidavit, you can still get enough partial credit to make a passing grade in the course. But you really, really need to contact me and/or show up in class.

Sunday, April 01, 2012

COMM 353: MIDTERMS, ALL-CAPS, NET ETIQUETTE, ANGER MANAGEMENT, SHOUTING AND OTHER THINGS THAT MATTER

Hi everybody -

Most of you should have your midterms back by now. I wanted to get them graded and back to you before the papers on "Years With Ross" are due this week.

Tangent on all-caps: You'll notice that I used ALL-CAPS in my comments on your midterms, but that's not because I'm SHOUTING. It's a convention they used at some magazines I've free-lanced for, where editorial comments were typed in all-caps inside brackets to set them apart from the copy in the actual article. That way, the typesetters (this was a while ago, when they still had typesetters at small publications) would know not to let anything in all-caps get into print. Otherwise, the rule is the same as what you're probably used to, especially for on-line communication. Web publisher Kass Johns sums it up in his "Basic Electronic Mail Netiquette (Network Etiquette)" like this: "The most important rule is never use all caps for your messages. IT MAKES IT LOOK LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING. It is highly offensive and especially hard to read." With the different colors used in the Track Changes mode in Microsoft Word, the older convention probably isn't necessary. And I think I'm probably going to get in step with the rest of the world and quit using all-caps that way. Times change.

But, still, there is a time and a place for shouting ...

One is when student papers are long overdue. So, if you have received an email message from me today, either (1) attaching your graded midterm with comments; or (2) asking you to submit parts of it to me in a different format, you're OK. But I am still missing one complete midterm (you know who you are), and if I don't get it in the next three days I AM GOING TO THROW A DAMN TANTRUM! Capice?

Thursday, March 29, 2012

COMM 353: Extra credit

For 30,000 extra credit points ...

In what large East Coast city does the New Yorker have its editorial offices:

a. Illiopolis
b. Riverton
c. New Berlin
d. Petersburg
e. New York

Post your answer as a comment below. To make the system work, please be sure to tell your classmates who are not present today what you did to earn the 30,000 points.

COMM 353: SCHEDULE -- SPRING 2012

COMM 353 – Spring 2012

Schedule – Bulldog Bytes
 April 5 – layout deadline
 April 10 – “camera-ready” PDF

Written work for class
 5- to 8-page paper on “Years With Ross” (which may or may not resemble blog posts) due April 5
 5- to 8-page self-reflective essay in which you evaluate their perceptions of the course material and its impact on their

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

COMM 353: Assignment for 5- to 8-page essay on "Years With Ross"

Among the written assignments stipulated in the syllabus for COMM 353 is a reflective essay on “Years With Ross.” It is due Thursday, April 5 (with a grace period to Tuesday, April 10). Please note that as we draw near the end of the semester, I am only giving you a half week's grace period. In order to avoid a last-minute scramble that will put us all in a bad mood, you should get the essay in on time.

The focus of your essay is something I've been asking about and you've been blogging about for several weeks now. In a well-written, thoughtful essay five to eight typed pages in length, discuss how The New Yorker reflected the spirit of its times what what lessons it might have for journalists who wish to reflect the spirit of our times in a magazine format (in print, broadcast of digital media, or a combination of all three). At the end of "Years With Ross," James Thurber has this assessment of the founding editor of The New Yorker:

H.W. Ross had a world and wealth of warming and wonderful things to look back upon as he lay dying. He had been a great success, he had made hundreds of friends and thousands of admiers, he had contributed soetmhing that had not happened before in his country, or enywhere else, to literature, comedy, and journalism, and he was leaving behind him an imposing monument. He had got his frail weekly off the rocky shoals of 1925 and piloted it into safe harbor through Depression and Recession, World War II, and the even greater perils of the McCarthy era. His good ship stood up all the way. (273)
From your reading of Thurber and from websites like the the Editor's Introduction and the thumbnails of the New Yorker staff in the a website Urban and Urbane: The New Yorker Magazine in the 1930s put up by students in American Studies at the University of Virginia, please evaluate how Ross and the others at The New Yorker collaborated to create a magazine.

In athis evaluation, please address these questions: (1) How was the New Yorker situated in the unique culture of its day? (2) How did that culture (Zeitgeist or whatever you want to call it) differ from ours today? (3) In what ways was that Zietgeist like ours? (4) Who is responding to the spirit of our times in ways that are like the New Yorker? (5) What opportunities are there today to create something new, "that had not happened before in his country, or enywhere else, to literature, comedy, and journalism?"

Background.
A Zeitgeist, according to Wikipedia, is the "the spirit of the times" or "the spirit of the age." That's the literal meaning of the German: "Zeit" is their word for time, and "Geist" is the word for spirit. Wikipedia explains, "Zeitgeist is the general cultural, intellectual, ethical, spiritual, or political climate within a nation or even specific groups, along with the general ambiance, morals, sociocultural direction, and mood associated with an era." Web resources on the New Yorker and the 1920s, 30s and f0s are linked below.

COMM 353: In class, Hiroshima, the spirit of the age and long-form journalism

At least two turn-of-the-century surveys identified the atomic bombing of Japan as the most significant news story of the 20th century. And the definitive account, a 31,000-word article on the destruction of Hiroshima by foreign correspondent John Hersey, appeared in The New Yorker. It relates to what I've been asking you to think about - how does a magazine refelct its Zeitgeist? and how can you as budding writers, publishers and communications professionals refect the spirit of our new age.

Hersey's Hiroshima took up the whole New Yorker issue of ____ 00, 1946, and it has come out as a bood. A very good introduction to Hiroshima by Harvard graduate Steve Rothman of Arlington, Mass., who began his website (linked below) as a grad school term paper at Harvard, sets the stage:
The article, written by John Hersey, created a blast of its own in the publishing world. The New Yorker sold out immediately, and requests for reprints poured in from all over the world. Following publication, "Hiroshima" was read on the radio in the United States and abroad. Other magazines reviewed the article and referred their readers to it. The Book-of-the-Month Club sent a copy of the article in book form to its entire membership as a free selection. Later that fall, "Hiroshima" was published as a book by Alfred A. Knopf and has remained in print ever since.
One of the surveys, I think the most significant, was conducted by the journalism school at New York University. It lists "The Top 100 Works of Journalism in the United States in the 20th Century" ... Hersey's Hiroshima is first. (The second, to give you some context, was Rachel Carson's Silent Spring (1962), and the third was Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein's Watergate investigations for the Washington Post in 1972-73. Fourth was Edward R. Murrow's "This is London . . ." radio reports for CBS on the German bombing of London in 1940.) The other survey, by the Newseum in Washington, D.C. The museum's historian Eric Newton said, "Americans have by a provocatively close margin picked the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima as the top news story of the 20th century." Some 30,000 members of the public ranked the atomic bomb as the most important, as did a sample of professional journalists. Men and the journalists ranked it most important, while women ranked it in fourth place, tied with the 1969 moon landing.

By any measure, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a big story. One measure of its importance was a Time magazine essay by James Agee Aug. 20, 1945. It must seem badly overwritten today, but in its time it expressed how people felt. Agee later wrote the novel A Death in the Family, a book on Depression-era sharecroppers called Let Us Now Praise Famous Men and the screenplay for The African Queen starring Humphrey Bogart and Katherine Hepburn. In an on-deadline essay the week after the bombs fell, he said:
e greatest and most terrible of wars ended, this week, in the echoes of an enormous event—an event so much more enormous that, relative to it, the war itself shrank to minor significance. The knowledge of victory was as charged with sorrow and doubt as with joy and gratitude. More fearful responsibilities, more crucial liabilities rested on the victors even than on the vanquished.
And this, as he concluded:
The promise of good and of evil bordered alike on the infinite— with this further, terrible split in the fact: that upon a people already so nearly drowned in materialism even in peacetime, the good uses of this power might easily bring disaster as prodigious as the evil. The bomb rendered all decisions made [during meetings of the leaders of the United States, Great Britain and the Soviet Union] so far, at Yalta and at Potsdam, mere trivial dams across tributary rivulets. When the bomb split open the universe and revealed the prospect of the infinitely extraordinary, it also revealed the oldest, simplest, commonest, most neglected and most important of facts: that each man is eternally and above all else responsible for his own soul, and, in the terrible words of the Psalmist, that no man may deliver his brother, nor make agreement unto God for him.
Agee is all but forgotten today, and he was more a competent journalist than a great writer, but I think he captured the spirit of age.

How did The New Yorker respond to the biggest story of the 20th century? What does James Thurber say about it in Years With Ross? Surf Steve Rothman's website at http://www.herseyhiroshima.com/ - be sure to click on the link where Rothman says, "You can see the first page of the article" and click again the enlarge it so you can get a taste of Hersey's writing). What do you think of it? What would you say the biggest story of our time is? How would you cover it if you were editing a magazine?

COMM 353: Rubrics ... ** UPDATED 04-03 **

I'm working up a rubric - a set of criteria for evaluating an assignment - for the outside readers of Bulldog Bytes, and I thought I'd show you the rubrics I'm working from. There are two that look especially useful:


  • For a magazine project at Sagemont School, a college prep school in suburban Miami.


  • For a graphic arts project developed by Aaron T. Kennedy, based on MidLink Magazine, a project of North Carolina State and the University of Central Florida
.Some others below at the bottom of this post, but they seem a little too high school-ish for our purposes, but I'll copy and paste the URLs below.

UPDATE (April 3): Here is an email I sent out this morning to people I'm asking to serve as jurors or outside readers:

Hi _____ -

Can you do me a big favor? I'm teaching an advanced seminar (COMM 353) this semester, and I need outside readers to evaluate a six- to eight-page magazine project the students are designing and editing. They're calling it "Bulldog Bytes"; they're focusing on physical fitness opportunities for Benedictine University Springfield students; and they plan to have a PDF file of the completed project ready by next week. I hope to have it to readers by the end of the week, and I need it back by April 24.

One component of their grade in the course will be an assessment of the completed magazine project by outside jurors (which is where you would come in, if you can do it). I am developing an informal rubric, which I can get to the jurors along with the PDF version of the magazine. I'll be asking jurors to consider things like whether the design and layout are attractive; the content is interesting and targeted to its intended audience of readers in the BenU-Springfield community; the articles are well written and observe the conventions of correct usage; the pictures and graphics enhance the story; and an overall judgment call of whether the product looks professional. I'm not asking the outside readers to grade the magazine (although you should feel free to recommend a grade if you wish), and I'm focusing on the product rather than the process as I develop the rubrics. I'm making a point designing everything so you won't have to spend more than a few minutes to look over the magazine, fill out the rubric and get it back to me by Tuesday, April 24, or thereabouts.

Please let me know if you can do this. And it goes without saying that if you can, I'll owe you one!


http://download.intel.com/education/Common/my/Resources/AP/plans/biographies/biographies_magazine_rubric.doc

http://www.morgan.k12.ga.us/mchs/Lisa_Adams/Autobiographical%20Magazine%20Project.doc

http://www.saskschools.ca/curr_content/modtasteofsask/extras/appendix/magazinerubric.pdf

http://mabryonline.org/blogs/kaplan/Rubric%20for%20Magazine%20Unit.doc

http://www2.brandonsd.mb.ca/crocus/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/CAA30S-Magazine-Layout-Rubric.pdf

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

COMM 353: For class, week of March 27 **UPDATED 03-29 **

Who - or what - was the "little old lady from Dubuque?" Why does she matter? Discuss. Post your thoughts as comments below. What are you going to do for the little old lady from Dubuque in Bulldog Bytes?

Monday, March 26, 2012

If you're following the Affordable Care Act argument before the U.S. Supreme Court this week ...

The best source - I would say the only source - for up-to-the-minute reporting and analysis of Supreme Court cases is SCOTUSblog at http://www.scotusblog.com/. "SCOTUS" is the Associated Press' abbreviation for the Supreme Court of the United States, and Lyle Denniston, who covers high-profile cases for the blog, is arguably the best legal analyst in the business. He isn't a lawyer, by the way. He's an old courthouse reporter.

(So am I, but who's to say I'm biased?)

A close second is Dahlia Lithwick, of Slate.com. Click here for her analysis "It’s Not About the Law, Stupid."

Sunday, March 25, 2012

COMM 353: An alternative weekly free-lance writer on Strunk, White, prolixity and long-form journalism

In the current issue of Illinois Times veteran free-lancer Jim Krohe has a reminiscence about writing long-form journalism for alternative newspapers. They're kind of a creature of the 1970s. (Don't knock it: So am I.) IT is an example. Riverfront Times in St. Louis is an example. The Chicago Reader is an example. In fact, The Reader is a great example because it was one of the first, and it's still one of the most successful.

Wikipedia, which has a pretty good page on alternative papers, says they're "a type of newspaper, that eschews comprehensive coverage of general news in favor of stylized reporting, opinionated reviews and columns, investigations into edgy topics and magazine-style feature stories highlighting local people and culture." They come out weekly, and they're a haven for long-form journalism.

Boy, do I mean long-form. Krohe says he developed a taste for it writing for The Chicago Reader:
... White and Strunk’s Elements of Style, which urges conciseness and brevity, made as little sense to me as, say, [right-wing tax protester] Grover Norquist on taxes. As a result, I have spent 35 years trying to cram magazine articles into the space of a newspaper column, and book chapters into the space of a magazine article, and haven’t pulled it off yet.

I might have been cured as a young professional had I gone to work for, say, a daily newspaper where reporters are typically given only 250 words to tell 500 words worth of story. Instead, like many a bright young boy from small-town Illinois who goes to Chicago, I met people all too willing to indulge my weaknesses for their own profit. I found them not in the drug dens of the West Side but in a converted warehouse in River North, at the offices of the Reader, Chicago’s alternative weekly.

I was to write nearly 60 pieces for that weekly, several of which were some 10,000 words long. By Reader standards, this verged on the laconic. The Reader of yore was a refuge for the endangered species known as long-form journalism. Ben Joravsky’s two-part report in 1992 on the Roosevelt High basketball program, for instance, added up to 40,000 words. This put the editors at odds with much of their readership, which cherished the paper mainly for its entertainment reviews and classified ads. One of the veteran editors, Michael Miner, recently offered this imaginary riposte to those who complained that even a commute on Chicago’s slow-poke el gave them too little time to finish a Reader cover story. “We’re publishing 20,000 words on beekeeping because Mike Lenehan felt like writing 20,000 words, and we know you won’t read 19,000 of them; but if you do, by God, you won’t find a single typo or dangling participle and you’ll learn a hell of a lot about bees. And if you don’t, no hard feelings and good luck finding that apartment.”
Long-form journalism, as no doubt you've noticed reading James Thurber's "Years With Ross," was developed largely by The New Yorker as life got serious with the Depression and World War II. The alternative weeklies, in a way, took what Ross did in New York and replicated the business model in smaller cities. In Chicago, according to a pretty good Wikipedia profile:
The Reader was perhaps best known for its deep, immersive style of literary journalism, publishing long, detailed cover stories, often on subjects that had little to do with the news of the day. An oft-cited example is a 19,000-word article on beekeeping by staff editor Michael Lenehan. This article won the AAAS Westinghouse Science Journalism Award, awarded by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in 1978. ... Ben Joravsky's "A Simple Game" followed a public high school basketball team for a full year. Published in two parts, a total of 40,000 words, it was reprinted in the anthology Best American Sportswriting 1993.
Ben Joravsky still covers politics for The Reader and has written five books, including a print adaptation of the TV documentary "Hoop Dreams" about high school basketball in Chicago. Mike Lenehan was for many years the executive editor of The Reader. His beekeeping article, which is famous in Chicago writing circles, ran in 1977 and has been reprinted in a book "The Essence of Beeing" (get the pun? get it? get it?), set in 12- and 14-point Cooper Oldstyle type and illustrated by artist and professor Alice Brown-Wagner. It is 45 pages long and costs $300 postpaid.

Harold Ross' New Yorker was the next best thing in the 1930s and 40s. Alternative were for the generation (mine) that came along in the 70s and 80s. What's going to be the next best thing for your generation?

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

COMM 353: For class Thursday ... ** UPDATED A LITTLE (see underlined text below) **

Go to the New Yorker website at http://www.newyorker.com/. Post your top-of-the-head thoughts to your blog ... or as a comment to this post ... or to whatever post you're posting it to ... or both ... or all three.

How does today’s New Yorker website compare to the magazine that Harold Ross created? The one you’ve been reading about? How does the New Yorker reflect the spirit of our age? (Also see definition of "Zeitgeist" below.) How would you describe is the spirit of our age, anyway? Post your thoughts as comments to this item.

Click here for a secret Mackerelwrapper message!

Monday, March 12, 2012

COMM 353: The New Yorker, the spirit of the times and the uncertainties of the 21st century

At the end of "Years With Ross," James Thurber has this assessment of the founding editor of The New Yorker:

H.W. Ross had a world and wealth of warming and wonderful things to look back upon as he lay dying. He had been a great success, he had made hundreds of friends and thousands of admiers, he had contributed soetmhing that had not happened before in his country, or enywhere else, to literature, comedy, and journalism, and he was leaving behind him an imposing monument. He had got his frail weekly off the rocky shoals of 1925 and piloted it into safe harbor through Depression and Recession, World War II, and the even greater perils of the McCarthy era. His good ship stood up all the way. (273)
In class during the next few days, we will unpack Thurber's statement. We'll see how well it holds up in light of other evidence we find, mostly on the World Wide Web, and we'll try to determine whether anyone can do today the same kinds of things Ross did in his day.

In class Tuesday, March 13:

We'll start by familiarizing ourselves with a website called Urban and Urbane: The New Yorker Magazine in the 1930s, put up by students in American Studies at the University of Virginia at

http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ug02/newyorker/newyorkerhome.html.

By the way, this was a student project. Does it give you any ideas for our student project? Just askin'.

Read the Editor's Introduction and the thumbnails of the New Yorker staff. How did these people collaborate to create a magazine? Then we'll surf around the UVa website.

Ask yourself: (1) How was the New Yorker situated in the unique culture of its day? (2) How did that culture (*Zeitgeist or whatever you want to call it) differ from ours today? (3) In what ways was that Zietgeist like ours? (4) Who is responding to the spirit of our times in ways that are like the New Yorker? (5) What opportunities are there today to create something new, "that had not happened before in his country, or enywhere else, to literature, comedy, and journalism?" Keep these questions in mind. They won't go away. In the meantime, if you find something interesting that we ought to look at as a class, post a link as a comment to this post.

(*I'm throwing around a kind of a scholarly buzzword there, so maybe we'd better take a closer look at it to make sure we all mean the same thing by it. The Zeitgeist, according to Wikipedia, is the "the spirit of the times" or "the spirit of the age." That's the literal meaning of the German: "Zeit" is their word for time, and "Geist" is the word for spirit. Wikipedia explains, "Zeitgeist is the general cultural, intellectual, ethical, spiritual, or political climate within a nation or even specific groups, along with the general ambiance, morals, sociocultural direction, and mood associated with an era." It's kind of pretentious, but it's late at night and I can't think of a better word at the moment.)

Find out as much as you can about the Roaring Twenties, the pop culture of the day, sports (Babe Ruth and Ty Cobb were at the top of their game in the 20s), "flappers," prohibition, jazz, movies and the literary scene especially in New York City. Post links to stuff we can all look at. Here are some good starting places:
As yourself the same questions: How did the New Yorker situate itself in its Zeitgeist? How did it change? What opportunities are there to do something similar in our time? Or are there any?

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Thomas Moore "The Meeting of the Waters"

Lyrics at http://www.free-scores.com/download-sheet-music.php?pdf=8805

PDF file for voice and piano at http://www.free-scores.com/download-sheet-music.php?pdf=8805

Lesley Nelson Burns at the Contemplator has this background: "Inspired by a visit with friends to the Vale of Avoca (in County Wicklow), Thomas Moore wrote these words to an old Irish air, The Old Head of Dennis." It's an old melody, and the tune was published in "Irish Melodies" in the 1820s. Several good versions (and a couple of awful ones) on YouTube.

A couple of the good ones:

RTÉ National Symphony Orchestra. ANÚNA, soloist Michael McGlynn & Linda Lampenius (violin) join the RTÉ National Symphony Orchestra (Conductor John Finucane), Ireland's leading orchestra, for Michael McGlynn's arrangement of "The Meeting of the Waters". This was recorded at the National Concert Hall, Dublin in July 2010.



The Wolfe Tones have a cover called the "Vale of Avoca" -- on YouTube with nice pix



Lyrics and notes from "Sing, Sweet Harp of Erin: Thomas Moore's Irish Melodies (1808)." Folkworld http://www.folkworld.de/37/e/moore.html

Moore's notes:

[1] "The Meeting of the Waters" forms a part of that beautiful scenery which lies between Rathdrum and Arklow, in the county of Wicklow, and these lines were suggested by a visit to this romantic spot, in the summer of the year 1807.
[2] The rivers Avon and Avoca.

A bronze bust of Moore marks the spot, and a plague records the tribute offered by Eamon de Valera: "During the dark and all but despairing days of the nineteenth century, Thomas Moore's songs kept the love of country and the lamp of hope burning in millions of Irish hearts here in Ireland and in many lands beyond the seas. His songs and his poems and his prose works, translated into many foreign tongues, made Ireland's cause known throughout the civilized world and won support for that cause from all who loved liberty and hated oppression."

In James Joyce's "Ulysses," Leopold Bloom remarks about the Moore statue in College Green Dublin: "They did right to put him up over a urinal: meeting of the waters."
"Meeting of the Waters" is usually scored in A, but Digital Tradition has a lead sheet with lyrics transposed to D. The thread "Tune Req: Meeting of the Waters" at Mudcat Cafe has dates of Thomas Moore's "Irish Melodies," also relationship (or lack thereof) of his air -- "The Old Head of Denis" -- and a Scottish pipe also titled "The Meeting of the Waters" but with a different melody. links to an early version of Andrew Kuntz' "Fiddlers Companion" w/ tune families, etc. AS ALWAYS, THE MUDCAT THREAD IS A VERY GOOD SOURCE AND HAS MORE INFORMATION THAN WHAT I'VE SUMMARIZED HERE.

From Fiddlers Companion (via keyword search on old Ceolas version linked to Mudcat Cafe):
MEETING OF THE WATERS, THE [1] (Ceann Deiginse). AKA and see "Todlin Hame," "Gage Fane", "Na Geadna Fiadaine," "The Wild Geese," "Armstrong's Farewell," "The Old Head of Denis," "My Name is Dick Kelly," "An Bacac Buide," "The Origin of the Harp," "Old Ireland Rejoice." Irish, Air (6/8 time). A Major. Standard. AB. The title appears in a list of tunes in his repertoire brought by Philip Goodman, the last professional and traditional piper in Farney, Louth, to the Feis Ceoil in Belfast in 1898 (Breathnach, 1997). Roche Collection, 1982, Vol. 3; No. 31, pg. 9.
And this, the tune that Moore cites as the air in Irish Melodies:
OLD HEAD OF DENIS, THE (Sean Ceann Doncad). AKA and see "Meeting of the Waters," "Helen," "The Wild Geese." Irish, Air (6/8 time, "with feeling"). G Major. Standard. One part. The melody was used by Thomas Moore for his text "The Meeting of the Waters," but was the vehicle for a number of hymns and ballads, including many cowboy songs such as "The Dreary Black Hills" and the Catskill Mountain (New York) collected "Rock Island Line" (Cazden, et al, 1982). O'Neill (1850), 1903/1979; No. 526, pg. 92.
The tune is related to the Irish lament for the Wild Geese who fled Ireland after the wars of Cromwell and William III:
WILD GEESE, THE [1] (Na Geadna Fiadaine). AKA and see "Gage Fane," "The Origin of the Harp," "Old Ireland Rejoice," "Armstrong's Farewell," "The Old Head of Denis," "The Meeting of the Waters," "Todlin Hame," "My Name is Dick Kelly," "An bacac buide," "An Cana Draigeann Eille," "Tis believed that this harp." Irish, Slow Air (3/4 time). A Major (O'Neill, O'Sullivan/Bunting): G Major (O Canainn). Standard. One part. This Irish air dates back to the mid-17th century and has often been used as a song tune. Perhaps the first lyrics were written in 1670 by John Fitzgerald, son of the Knight of Glin. In the next century a version called in Irish "Na Geandna Fiadaine" had its title mangled into English as "Gage Fane" and appeared in several collections. The given title commemorates the thousands of Irish soldiers who fled to France and Spain after the Treaty of Limerick in 1691, preferring an honorable exile to remaining in their country when their cause was lost. These exiles sustained the national reputation afterwards under the name of the Irish Brigade in the wars on the Continent.
***
A legend has it that the air was sung by the women assembled on the shore at the time the troops embarked after the defeat of the Gaelic chiefs. O'Sullivan (1983) points out this is poetic license for the exodus was gradual, and not an embarkation along the lines of Dunkirk in this century, but (quoting MacGeoghan, who states in his History of Ireland {pg. 599}) "within the 50 years which followed the Treaty of Limerick 450,000 Irish soldiers died in the service of France." O'Sullivan also adds the title "Na Geadna Fiadhaine" is a translation of the English "The Wild Geese," and not vice versa, but that even the Gaelic-speaking majority at the time referred to these men as "Wild Geese," for they flocked before taking flight.
***
Source for notated version: Bunting noted the tune from Patrick Quin, the harper, in 1803. Holden (Collection), volume II, 1806 (appears as "Gage Fane"). Mulholland (Collection), 1810 (appears under the erroneous title "The Wild Swan"). Neale (Celebrated Irish Tunes), pg. 25. Ó Canainn (Traditional Slow Airs of Ireland), 1995; No. 51, pgs. 46-47. O'Neill (1850), 1979; No. 170, pg. 30. O'Sullivan/Bunting, 1983; No. 113, pgs. 162-164. Thompson (Hibernian Muse), c. 1789 (appears as "Irish Air"). Island ILPS9432, The Chieftains - "Bonaparte's Retreat" (1976). RCA 09026-61490-2, The Chieftains - "The Celtic Harp" (1993).
And to quite a few other tunes as well, on both sides of the Atlantic, including the "Rye Whiskey" family and tunes heard at the Belfast harp festival in 1798:
BACA(C)H BUIDHE, AN (Lame Yellow Beggar). AKA and see "Bacach Buidhe Na Leige" (The Yellow Beggar of the League), "The Lame Yellow Beggar," "The Wild Geese," "Johnnie Armstrong," "Todlin Hame," "The Meeting of the Waters." Irish, Air (4/4 time). B Flat Major (O'Sullivan/Bunting): G Major (Flood). Standard. AAB (Flood): ABB (O'Sullivan/Bunting). The great Irish collector Edward Bunting's 1840 publication attributes composition of this melody to the famous Ulster harper Rory Dall O'Cahan in the year 1650. Though born in Ulster, O'Cahan performed primarily in Scotland, and this tune is "said to have been composed by him in reference to his own fallen fortunes, towards the end of his career." {See note for "Give Me Your Hand" for more information on O'Cahan). Audiences heard the air in "The Beggar's Wedding" (1728), an opera by Charles Coffey of Dublin, and it was printed in the score in 1729. The title was reported by the Belfast Northern Star of July 15th, 1792, as having been a tune played by one of ten Irish harp masters at the last great convocation of ancient Irish harpers, the Belfast Harp Festival, held that week. Bunting, who was in attendance at the festival, claimed to have noted it from harper Charles Byrne in his manuscript, though he attributes harper Daniel Black in 1792 as the source in his 1840 published work. The melody may also be found in Neales' Celebrated Irish Tunes, pg. 26 and Holden's Old Established Tunes, pg. 36, reports O'Sullivan (1983), and is a variant of the melody known variously as "Johnnie Armstrong," "Todlen Hame," "Rye Whisky," "Jack of Diamonds," "Drunken Hiccups," etc. Flood, 1905; pg. 80. Murphy (A Collection of Irish Airs and Jiggs, 1809 or 1820; pg. 22. O'Sullivan/Bunting, 1983; No. 20, pgs. 34-35.
There's an American parody "The Meeting of the Waters of Hudson & Erie" by Samuel Woodworth. It begins like Moore's, "There is not in the wild world a Valley so sweet ..." but gets off into the brave new America vs. tired old Europe meme pretty quickly:
Yet it is not that Wealth now enriches the scene
Where the treasures of Art, and of Nature, convene
'Tis not that this union our coffers may fill
O! no - it is something more exquisite still

'Tis, that Genius has triumph'd and Science prevail's
Tho' Prejudice flouted, and Envy assail'd
It is, that the vassals of Europe may see
The progress of mind, in a land that is free.
And so on

COMM 353: Week of March 13-15

BY THE WAY: I've been expecting to get emails from some of you with your completed midterms and links to your blogs. (You know who you are.) In fact I have been pining ,sad and lonely, by my inbox all weekend, and I am getting impatient. Federal law does not permit me to discuss the grades of individual students in public, but I believe I am allowed to discuss certain mathematical truths. One of them is the concept of zero (0). If I don't have your midterm, your grade is a zero. A zero is not a grade you want to have. DO I MAKE MY MEANING CLEAR?

Notes from class - edit board ... Thursday, March
 supermemoryman at gmail dot com for 2nd edits by Tuesday morning, march __
 pix at same time email articles


Keep your edits.

In class Tuesday, March 13:

Find out as much as you can about the Roaring Twenties and the literary scene in New York City. Here are some good starting places:



Monday, March 05, 2012

COMM 353: Week of March 6-8 -- some thoughts and links on editing, an opportunity to express yourself in writing and a start on the week's assignments

I know a writer who refuses to let a word of his prose be altered. You’ve never heard of him. It’s a shame. His small press books would sell much better if he would.

I also know a best-selling author of Civil War historical novels who recently released his third book. I came up to him at a literary festival and blurted out, “You’re brilliant!” He blushed. “Shucks,” he said, “my editor made me cut out 200 pages.”

-- Charles J. Shields, "The Editor of the Breakfast Table" Qtd. in About.com



Editing for publication is about more than grammar, punctuation, spelling and the nits we used to pick in freshman English. As Carol Saller suggests in her "Subversive Copy Editor," it's about relationships. Writers' relationships with their readers. With other writers. With all the other people involved in getting a publication on the street (or up on the World Wide Web). A good editor mediates those relationships, helps the writers relate to all those proofreaders, layout people, compositors, typesetters and -- foremost and always -- all those readers.

It's about correct grammar and mechanics, too, but they're just part of a much larger picture. A very useful tip sheet on magazine editing at eHow.com lists seven steps in getting an article ready for publication. The first: "Read the article. Re-read the article if time allows. ... Follow your instincts to determine whether this article will be attractive to your readership and, in turn, help increase magazine sales." Notice it's about sales? We're in a commercial world when we write for magazines (or edit them), so we do pay attention to the bottom line.

The second point deals with the tone and flow of a piece. With the third, we finally get to grammar, word choice and spelling ... but even then, eHow counsels, "... be careful not to take away the meaning of that passage. The goal is to make the article more interesting and easier to read." The fourth through the seventh steps are about copyfitting, fact checking, layout and, yes, another roud of editing at the copy desk for "checking for errors in grammar, spelling, statistical or factual errors." Taken together, they're a good summary of the editorial process at most magazines. Let's follow this link and together read the eHow tip sheet. How do these steps build on each other and fit together into a smooth editorial process?

Linked below are several Web pages about editing listed in a directory of writing tips about Editors and Editing on the About.com Grammar & Composition Web site. Before surfing around and finding some advice you find useful, here are a couple I like:
  • Lilian Ross, a longtime writer for The New Yorker, once said (in an often-quoted passage picked up by About.com:
    A helpful editor should have the following qualities: understanding of and sympathy for writers; the editorial talent to recognize and appreciate journalistic and literary talent; an openness to all kinds of such talent; confidence and strength in his own judgment; resistance to fads and fakery in publishing; resistance to corruption and opportunism, to exhortations from people, including writers and other editors, who are concerned with "popularity" and "the market"; moral and mental strength, and the physical strength to sustain these; energy and resourcefulness in helping writers discover what they should write about; literally unlimited patience with selfishness and egotism; the generosity and character required to give away his own creativity and pour it into a group of greedy and usually ungrateful writers.
    On the seventh day, presumably, the helpful editor rests.

  • Ross' quote is worth thinking about even though (or because!) it reminds me of what Stanley Walker, a famous city editor at the old New York Herald-Tribune, said in 1924 about newspapering:
    What makes a good newspaperman? The answer is easy. He knows everything. He is aware not only of what goes on in the world today, but his brain is a repository of the wisdom of the ages. He is not only handsome, but he has the physical strength which enables him to perform great feats of energy. He can go for nights on end without sleep. He dresses well and talks with charm. Men admire him; women adore him; tycoons and statesmen are willing to share their secrets with him. He hates lies and meanness and sham, but he keeps his temper. He is loyal to his paper and to what he looks upon as the profession; whether it is a profession, or merely a craft, he resents attempts to debase it. When he dies, a lot of people are sorry, and some of them remember him for several days.


  • Maxwell Perkins was a great literary editor of the same period as Lillian Ross and Stanley Walker. Perkins shepherded novels by Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald and Thomas Wolfe into print for Scribners. There's not a lot about him on the World Wide Web, other than a few orphaned quotes on one of those websites that collect Famous Quotes and Authors My favorite: "Just get it down on paper, and then we'll see what to do with it." A nice summary of Perkins' philosophy of editing in an article article on Perkins by John Walsh, of the London Independent, when a biopic of the famous editor was announced in 2010. It's worth quoting at length:
    He did not, as some people imagine, rewrite the works of his starry charges; instead he gave them advice on structure, selection and where their creative instincts were taking them. Oddly, for an editor, he was sloppy about punctuation, spelling and proof-reading. His letters were written in a slapdash tirade of half-connected thoughts, linked by commas and plus signs. This, for instance, to Hemingway: "I'm glad you're going to write some stories. All you have to do is to follow your own judgement, or instinct + disregard what is said, + convey the absolute bottom quality of each person, situation + thing. Isn't that simple!!... I can get pretty depressed but even at worst I still believe... that the utterly real thing in writing is the only thing that counts + the whole racket melts down before it. All you have to do is trust yourself."
    According to Holywood Reporter, Sean Penn was being considered for the role of Perkins' character, by the way. That was in the summer of 2010. Nothing heard of it since then.
Now it's your turn: Open up the About.com directory, surf around the pages that are links to it. Don't omit the ones from newspapers. (Have you noticed, by the way, how many of these old geezers had newspaper backgrounds? You're probably aware your editing instructor is an old geezer with a newspaper background, too. What kind of writing gig in today's world is comparable to newspapering in my day?) Now that I've shared with you some of the wisdom I like, share with us the pearls you find as you surf through the linked pages. Quote a couple. Quote them, with an identifying signal phrase, so we know where you got them.

Focus on answering these questions: WHAT MAKES A GOOD EDITOR GOOD? WAS HAROLD ROSS A GOOD EDITOR?

Post your comments to your blogs and send me a link (if you haven't done so already).


For the rest of the week, i.e. the rest of today's class and Thursday's, here's what's in the syllabus:

Week 8 (March 6-8)
• Reading: Thurber, 121-154. How did the New Yorker’s editorial product change from the “roaring 20s” to the Great Depression, World War II and beyond? How did Ross change? Or did he?Keep following the New Yorker’s website at http://www.newyorker.com/.
• Writing: Keep blogging. What insights from the long-ago historical periods that Thurber writes about can offer you guidance for the second decade of the 21st century?
• Editing: [Keep doing what we're doing. It's getting about time to have copy in more-or-less final form and start dummying the publication. What's it going to look like? I feel like we're on schedule so far, but we've also got spring break coming up. And then Easter. So we want to make sure time doesn't get away from us. Just sayin'.]

Thursday, March 01, 2012

COMM 353: "One-minute" type essay on course content

NOTE TO STUDENTS: Those of us who were in class today wrote out answers to these questions, printed out copies and emailed backup copies to me. If you weren't in class (and you know who you are), email them to me.

1. What have you learned about editing so far in COMM 353?

2. What did you know at the beginning of the semester?

3. What have you picked up from reading Nancy Brigham, Carol Saller and other handouts/Web sites, etc.?

4. What have you earned so far about editing, production, etc. – the actual process of getting a publication on the street – so far from the Bulldog Bytes project?

5. What would you like to learn in the second half of the semester?

Thursday, February 23, 2012

COMM 353: Assignments for week of Feb. 28-March 1. Thurber, Ross and Bulldog Bytes ... and some recycled, but important stuff on "Years WIth Ross"

In class, we'll continue our juggling act:
  • We'll touch base on copy and edits for the Bulldog Bytes, and take another look at the handout from Nancy Brigham's how-to book for UAW local newsletter editors. How does she talk about editing? How is it different from the way Carol Saller of the Univesity of Chicago Press talks about editing? How is it different from the way we talk about editing in college?
  • We'll get some more experience with the Track Changes mode in Microsoft Word, by adapting one of the exercises on the website for British journalism students we looked at last week. I'd like to have you project your edits in class. WATCH THIS SPACE FOR DETAILS.
  • We'll compare notes on our impressions of James Thurber's "Years With Ross," about the founding editor of the New Yorker, and we'll look at some of Thurber's writing in class. Let's compare notes on that, too. I MAY GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS YOURSELF IN WRITING ABOUT THIS. WATCH THIS SPACE, TOO.

James Thurber

An animated version of "The Last Flower," Thurber's cartoon fable published in November 1939 (two months after the outbreak of World War II), is embedded below. There's a very nice soundtrack to the YouTube clip, but it isn't Thurber's. He drew "The Last Flower" as cartoons on the printed page. So after a minute or so I turned the soundtrack off. The book didn't have one, and we don't heed one either. I've always been impressed with how much emotion Thurber could convey with very simple line drawings. And, of course, his wry sense of humor. But I don't want to say too much about what I think. I'd rather hear what you think.



Let's read the following (did I say "let's?" What I meant was you are hereby commanded to read ...):
If you want to go deeper on Thurber, there's also a useful directory on the Big Eye website.

Here's some stuff recycled from last month's Mackerel Wrapper. We didn't do much with it at the time, but it makes some points from Adam Gopnik's intro to "Years WIth Ross" that we shouldn't forget:
... these are some of the things that struck me in James Thurber's "The Years With Ross" about the early glory years of the New Yorker under founding editor Harold Ross:
  • First thing I learn right off the bat: I really ought to go back and look at the damn book before I write out assignments! This book doesn't have an "introduction." It has forewords. A couple of them. The first, and most important, is by the New Yorker's cultural affairs writer Adam Gopnik.
  • Gopnik tells us what to look for in the book, too. Here's one thing: "... the story it tells [is] about how writers and editors together, in the years between [World War I Gen. John] Pershing and Pearl Harbor, made a new kind of American music ... a style emerged that still strikes a downbeat for most good American writing today." Gopnik is using "music," of course, as a metaphor from writing.
  • And this: "... there is something permanent in The Years with Ross about how a writer learns to write, what an editor can teach him, and how the tone they shape together can be around for other writers when both of them are gone."
  • A comment about Thurber, but it applies as well to the "music" or prose style that The New Yorker did so much to develop: "No one worked harder or went further to slim down the space between American speaking and writing voices, between the way we talk and the way we write."
  • Gopnik writes for The New Yorker, and he says that style survives today. "Those of us who draw our paychecks at that particular window think it still goes on at the magazine itself, and we knock ourselves out trying to make sure it can. But it doesn't belong to us any more than it ever did. ... I sometimes think of Thurber's late, lovely fable of the last flower, where the world contines because one man, one woman, and one flower are left after the Apocalypse to continue it. Ross's years, Thurber's tone, will go on, I believe, if there remains only one weird and moving fact, one writer to point at it, and one reader to take heart at its presence."
Notice how the world wars, WWI and WWII, defined the New Yorker's moment in history? What defines our moment in history in the early years of the 21st century? How is it different? How is it the same? How can it shape our careers as writers and/or journalists?

Monday, February 20, 2012

COMM 353: Assignments for week of Feb. 21-23

STUDENTS PLEASE NOTE: The blog post below, which I originally posted before Thursday's class session, has links to some exercises on editing. I want to use them to get you up to speed on the Track Changes mode in Microsoft Word. We'll go to the exercises as soon as we're clear on this week's assignments per this post.

This week we're going to shift gears. Your articles for Bulldog Bytes and your midterm are due this week; please email them both to me, and let me have the email address you want to use as we schlepp copies of your articles around. Unless we come up with a better idea, I plan to use email and the "reply all" mode to get material to you for editing and discussion.

In the meantime, we're going to pick up speed on the reading and writing components of the course as we start reading James Thurber's biography "The Years With Ross." It's a biography of Harold Ross, founding editor of The New Yorker. (There are those who say, with some justice, it's as much an autobiography of Thurber as it is a biography of Ross. But you can decide for yourself on that.) I hope to have a handout for you from "Newsroom Management: A Guide to Theory and Practice" by Robert A. Giles on leadership styles. As you read about Ross, you'll discover he had a very distinctive management style -- if you can even call it that! -- and you'll want to be able to evaluate it in terms of management theory.

We'll follow two related threads:

1. Starting now, blog your reactions to "Years With Ross." Our readings so far haven't lent themselves to blogging on your part, so I haven't been requiring it. (Although if you *have* been blogging without my prompting you, I'll make sure you get credit for it!) Now, however, you'll notice the weekly reading assignments ask specific questions I want you to blog about.

2. You'll also notice I want you to read and blog about the New Yorker's website. It's the continuation of Ross' magazine, and as you read more you'll be able to make comparisons. For now, though, just start reading it. Surf around and try to find something you're interested in. How has it changed from what Thurber describes? How is it the same?

Here are the assignments from last week and this week in our syllabus. They are lightly heavily edited:
Week 5 (Feb. 14-16)
• Reading: Thurber, ix-35 (this includes reading Thurber’s foreword and re-reading [Adam] Gopnik’s [we read it the first time back in January], which may give you some indication of how important I think it is). Keep Start following the New Yorker’s website at http://www.newyorker.com/.
• Writing: Keep blogging if you've started a blog, and start blogging if you haven't. As you start reading Thurber, ask yourself how this story of a very idiosyncratic guy who founded a magazine nearly 100 years ago can have any relevance to our world of bewildering change in media. Blog about it. Keep it in mind as you read on.
• Editing: [deleted - we're going to handle the edits differently in class, but for now the main thing is to get going on Bulldog Bytes]

Week 6 (Feb . 21-23)
• Reading: Thurber, 36-99. Keep Start following the New Yorker’s website at http://www.newyorker.com/. As you read more of Thurber, you’ll notice he isn’t exactly writing a straight biography. He’s tricky. What’s his attitude toward Ross? How does he convey it? What can you learn about editing – and about writing – from reading it? Are there principles and practices, tricks, techniques or odd little bits of information you can apply you own career?
• Writing: Keep blogging about your experience and your reading. My questions under the reading assignments are intended to be blogworthy, and you should address them in the blog.
• Editing: [deleted - see above]

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

COMM 353 - ** ROLLED OVER FROM LAST WEEK ** proofreading and "subediting" exercises, and the Track Changes mode in Microsoft Word

PLEASE NOTE: Since half the class was absent Thursday, we couldn't do the exercises I'd planned, we'll do them Tuesday, Feb. 21.

How cool can this be? (Don't answer!) In class today we'll do some editing exercises ...

The purpose of these exercises is to get you familiar with the "Track Changes" mode in Microsoft Word. It's not the best software in the world, but it's the industry standard and the strike-through and underlining conventions it uses (especially if you turn off the @#$%! "balloon" revisions) are very commonly used to indicate deletions and additions respectively (how would you, by the way, edit this sentence that I'm writing right now?). To do the exercises, copy and paste them into a blank Microsoft Word document, double-space it and get into the "Track Changes" mode.

Uff. Oxford comma. Let's try that again: 'To do the exercises, copy and paste them into a blank Microsoft Word document, double-space it, and get into the "Track Changes" mode.' See the tiny red blob I added? It's a red comma, underlined, like you get in Track Changes. I don't claim it's perfect, but it's useful. And Microsoft Word already has it, so there's no extra cost. Worth learning.

The exercises are on a website called Journalism Careers by a British free-lancer named Sean McManus. He's selling a book, and I'm always suspicious of promotional websites, but McManus looks pretty knowledgeable. And his advice strikes me as kosher. From his blurb:
Sean McManus was first published in a computer magazine while at school and now has ten years experience researching, writing and editing for business and consumer publications. He has written for several magazines you've heard of (such as Personal Computer World, Marketing Week and Melody Maker) and plenty you probably haven't (including World Highways, Customer Loyalty Today and Bridge design & engineering).
So here's another guy who's out in the marketplace hustling free-lance gigs, and using the web to promote himself. Doing the kinds of things we have to do in today's economy, in other words.

McManus has journalism, proofreading and subediting exercises (subediting is the British word for what we call copyediting). In class we'll look at the exercises on:
  • Broken sentences
  • proofreading and subediting exercise
  • Finding the angle
And do some of them.

COMM 353 - midterm test - due Feb. 23

PLEASE NOTE: (1) This draft of the midterm is substantially revised from what I posted earlier; and (2) I have gone back and stricken Sunday's version, so this is the "official" midterm. -- pe

Below are three essay questions – one worth fifty (50) points out of a hundred, and two shorter essays worth 25 points each. Please write at least two pages double-spaced (500 words) on the 50-point essay and at least one page (250 words) on each of the 25-point short essays. Use plenty of detail from your reading in the textbook, the internet and handouts I have given you, as well as class discussion, to back up the points you make. Your grade will depend both on your analysis of the broad trends I ask about, and on the specific detail you cite in support of the points you make. I am primarily interested in the specific factual arguments you make to support your points. So be specific. Remember: An unsupported generalization is sudden death in college-level writing.

1. Main essay (50 points). In his college textbook "Newsroom Management: A Guide to Theory and Practice" (1991), Robert A. Giles says, "Working in the newsroom is a highly social process, involving much discussion, challenge, give-and-take, and many questions in the sometimes fractious, sometimes agonizing process of deciding how to play the day's news. Contact between boss and worker is routine, a natural part of an environment in which aggressive, independent-minded individuals honor both teamwork and disagreement ." To what degree is the process of writing, editing and publishing collaborative? How do Carol Saller of the University of Chicago Press and Nancy Brigham of the United Auto Workers advise editors to foster creativity on the part of writers and give it direction? Is it possible, in your opinion, to do both at the same time? How can editors strike a balance between the need for creativity and direction?

2A. Short essay (25 points). In “How to Do Leaflets, Newsletters and Newspapers,” Nancy Brigham of the UAW says in planning a publication, editors should: “Work backwards.” She adds, “Start with the date the paper must appear and then allow enough time for each process, from the printing through the paste-up, layout, typesetting, editing, writing and research or interviewing.” At what stage in the process does she suggest deciding on things like typeface, the size of body type and headlines, the placement of columns and pictures, and use of the Oxford comma? Why? What does she mean by working backward? Why does she advise doing it that way? How much, in your experience, have computers changed the planning process from what she describes?

2B. Self-reflective essay (25 points). What have you learned about COMM 353 so far that you didn’t know before? Consider what you knew at the beginning of the course and what you know now. What point or points stand out most clearly to you? What points are still confusing? In answering this question, please feel free to look at the “Tip Sheet on Writing a Reflective Essay” linked to my faculty webpage. In grading the essay, I will evaluate the relevance of your discussion to the main goals and objectives of the course; the detail you cite to support or illustrate your points; and the connections you make.

Blog Archive

About Me

Springfield (Ill.), United States
I'm a retired English, journalism and cultural studies teacher at Springfield College in Illinois (acquired by Benedictine University and subsequently closed). I coordinate jam sessions for the "Clayville Pioneer Academy of Music" at Clayville Historic Site and the Prairieland Strings dulcimer club, and I sing in the choir and the contemporary praise team at Peace Lutheran Church in Springfield. On Hogfiddle I post links and video clips for our sessions and workshops on the mountain dulcimer (a.k.a. "hog fiddle"), as well as research notes on folklore and cultural studies, hymnody and traditional Anglo-Celtic and Scandinavian music. I also posted assignments and readings in my interdisciplinary humanities classes. The Mackerel Wrapper (now on hiatus), carried assignments and readings for my mass comm. students. I started teaching b/log when I chaired SCI-Benedictine's assessment committee, and reopened it as the privatization of public schools grew increasingly troubling and closer to home.