Q. What's worse than accusing a newspaper guy of downloading kiddie porn onto a newsroom computer?Read all about it in Jim Romenesko's industry blog on the Poynter Insititute website. It's called -- what else? -- "Romenesko," and its "daily fix of media industry news, commentary, and memos" is must reading for news junkies.
A. Running a story about it without contacting him first to comment on the accusation.
Today's blog has several stories on the child pornography story, which apparently grows out of a longstanding labor dispute in Santa Barbara, Calif. Scroll down to the headline, and link, that says, "Roberts blasts News-Press' "defamatory" computer porn story." There are stories linked from The San Francisco Chronicle, The New York Times and local papers in Santa Barbara.
Open another window, go to the Society of Professional Journalists' website and see which canons of the SPJ Code of Ethics come into play here.
Here's another one. You won't find it in the SPJ code, but here's something working journalists have done for years and years. You can refuse to have your byline put on a story. Sometimes you have to. I wonder if that's what's happenening with the anonymous story in yesterday's paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment