Please read it, post your analysis to your blog next week and turn in a hard copy to me for grading. As you read the story, ask yourself the following questions. And incorporate your answers into a sparkling, witty, trenchant, publishable 1,000-word analysis. Due in class Thursday, Oct. 5:
- Who did Mayer talk to in order to get the story? How many different people? What kinds of information did she get from each? What details by direct observation during her interviews? (b) What details did she get by reading? How many written sources - e.g. books and/or magazines, websites, etc. - did she consult? How long would you guess it took her to get all these details in the story? Was it worth her time? What do the details add to the story?
- Is Mayer's story hard news, soft news or a combination? Why do you say that? Does it have a hard lede or a soft lede? What is the tone of her story? Does she seem factual? Objective? Does she express an opinion? Where?
- Does Mayer use "literary" techniques in writing the story? If so, what are they? Do they add or detract from the story?
- What does Murray mean by "craft?" What do you mean by it? How does "craft" differ from "art?"
- What the @#$%!& does that have to do with writing? With reporting? With your career ambitions as a ______________?
- What is the relationship between the craft of reporting and of writing? To Murray? To you?
1 comment:
See kaitlynleann.blogspot.com
"Your HTML cannot be accepted: Must be at most 4,096 characters"
Post a Comment