A weblog for Pete Ellertsen's mass communications students at Benedictine University Springfield.

Friday, November 03, 2006

COM 150: Read and discuss (post below)

Here are a couple of things for you to read along with the "kid with a modem" piece on the Danwei website in Beijing. They'll give you three points of view on how the internet appears to be opening up the political process to people who aren't traditional "gatekeepers," i.e. interested citizens, bloggers and, yeah, kids with modems. Once you've followed the links, read all three, thought about them for a minute or two and discussed it with classmates sitting near you, post your thoughts as comments to this blog.

Here's a good overview in USA Today. It appeared three years ago, at the end of 2003, and that's a lifetime or more on the World Wide Web. But it gives the main outlines of the blogosphere. Says staff writer :
The freewheeling, gossipy Internet sites they operate can be controversial: Matt Drudge, the wired news and gossip hound who broke the story about Monica Lewinsky's affair with Bill Clinton, is a blogger. Many bloggers are not professional journalists. Few have editors. Most make no pretense of objectivity.

Yet they're forcing the mainstream news media to follow the stories they're pushing, such as the scandal that took down Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott. And they've created a trend that almost every major presidential candidate is following. Even President Bush's campaign Web site hosts a blog.
Lott, R-Miss., is still in the U.S. Senate. And Drudge is still blogging. And the mainstream media are blogging now more than ever before. Here's a link to "The Swamp," a political blog on the Chicago Tribune's website. Unlike the daily Trib (in which it doesn't appear), the blog is updated several times a day -- as the news happens.

I found the USA Today profile by searching keywords "politics" and "bloggers" in Google. Why don't you do the same? Then post your thoughts, along with interesting nuggets of fact you found out, as comments to this message.

2 comments:

Pete said...

I think you're right, Tyler, on both counts:

1. We'll still have local papers for the school lunch menus and Friday night ballgame scores, and almost ever¥thing else will move to the web.

2. Technology happens (to misquote a bumper sticker).

As far as what government can do about it, read what I quoted in today's blog (Sunday) about the guy in Arabia, King Charles II and the coffeehouses.

Terah Ellison said...

The internet is changing everything, and the invention of the blog has helped change it. Blogs are everywhere, and everyone has access to read and comment on them. There is no regulation on who says what...a perfect example is the blogger who posted the story about Clinton and Lewinsky. Also, the Singapore kid has a point, anyone can access info from anywhere in the world at anytime. Because the internet has no regulations, the government's efforts to control it will never work. The internet is replacing printed media, and will soon replace much more.

Blog Archive

About Me

Springfield (Ill.), United States
I'm a retired English, journalism and cultural studies teacher at Springfield College in Illinois (acquired by Benedictine University and subsequently closed). I coordinate jam sessions for the "Clayville Pioneer Academy of Music" at Clayville Historic Site and the Prairieland Strings dulcimer club, and I sing in the choir and the contemporary praise team at Peace Lutheran Church in Springfield. On Hogfiddle I post links and video clips for our sessions and workshops on the mountain dulcimer (a.k.a. "hog fiddle"), as well as research notes on folklore and cultural studies, hymnody and traditional Anglo-Celtic and Scandinavian music. I also posted assignments and readings in my interdisciplinary humanities classes. The Mackerel Wrapper (now on hiatus), carried assignments and readings for my mass comm. students. I started teaching b/log when I chaired SCI-Benedictine's assessment committee, and reopened it as the privatization of public schools grew increasingly troubling and closer to home.